reasoning benchmark
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level C.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about SWE-Bench Verified.
Claude Fable 5 is currently ranked first with 95.0%.
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
100 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.