llmboard.ai
Benchmarks
CompareRankings
llmboard.ai
Benchmarks
CompareRankings
HomeBenchmarksmathMathVista

math benchmark

MathVista

MathVista evaluates mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts. It consists of 6,141 examples derived from 28 existing multimodal datasets and 3 newly created datasets (IQTest, FunctionQA, and PaperQA), combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess models' ability to understand complex figures and perform rigorous reasoning.

Updated Aug 11, 2026

Models39
Model coverage39
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Distribution
  • Highlights
  • About
  • FAQ

MathVista Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

39 rows
Columns

Show columns

1BYSeed 2.1 ProByteDance90.7%100.0%39CAug 11, 2026
2BYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDance90.5%97.4%39CAug 11, 2026
3OPo3OpenAI86.8%94.7%39CAug 11, 2026
4OPo4-miniOpenAI84.3%92.1%39CAug 11, 2026
5STStep3-VL-10BStepFun84.0%89.5%39CAug 11, 2026
6COCommand A+Cohere80.6%86.8%39CAug 11, 2026
7MAKimi-k1.5Moonshot AI74.9%84.2%39CAug 11, 2026
8MELlama 4 MaverickMeta73.7%81.6%39CAug 11, 2026
9OPGPT-4.1 miniOpenAI73.1%79.0%39CAug 11, 2026
10OPGPT-4.5OpenAI72.3%76.3%39CAug 11, 2026
11OPGPT-4.1OpenAI72.2%73.7%39CAug 11, 2026
12OPo1OpenAI71.8%71.0%39CAug 11, 2026
13ACQvQ-72B-PreviewAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team71.4%68.4%39CAug 11, 2026
14MELlama 4 ScoutMeta70.7%65.8%39CAug 11, 2026
15MAPixtral LargeMistral AI69.4%63.2%39CAug 11, 2026
16XAGrok-2xAI69.0%60.5%39CAug 11, 2026
17GOGemini 1.5 ProGoogle68.1%57.9%39CAug 11, 2026
18XAGrok-2 minixAI68.1%55.3%39CAug 11, 2026
19ACQwen2.5-Omni-7BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team67.9%52.6%39CAug 11, 2026
20ANClaude 3.5 SonnetAnthropic67.7%50.0%39CAug 11, 2026
21MAMistral Small 3.2 24B InstructMistral AI67.1%47.4%39CAug 11, 2026
22GOGemini 1.5 FlashGoogle65.8%44.7%39CAug 11, 2026
23OPGPT-4oOpenAI63.8%42.1%39CAug 11, 2026
24DEDeepSeek VL2DeepSeek62.8%39.5%39CAug 11, 2026
25MIPhi-4-multimodal-instructMicrosoft62.4%36.8%39CAug 11, 2026
26OPGPT-4oOpenAI61.4%34.2%39CAug 11, 2026
27DEDeepSeek VL2 SmallDeepSeek60.7%31.6%39CAug 11, 2026
28MAPixtral-12BMistral AI58.0%28.9%39CAug 11, 2026
29MELlama 3.2 90B InstructMeta57.3%26.3%39CAug 11, 2026
30OPGPT-4o miniOpenAI56.7%23.7%39CAug 11, 2026
31OPGPT-4.1 nanoOpenAI56.2%21.1%39CAug 11, 2026
32GOGemini 1.5 Flash 8BGoogle54.7%18.4%39CAug 11, 2026
33DEDeepSeek VL2 TinyDeepSeek53.6%15.8%39CAug 11, 2026
34XAGrok-1.5xAI52.8%13.2%39CAug 11, 2026
35XAGrok-1.5VxAI52.8%10.5%39CAug 11, 2026
36MELlama 3.2 11B InstructMeta51.5%7.9%39CAug 11, 2026
37GOGemini 1.0 ProGoogle46.6%5.3%39BAug 11, 2026
38MIPhi-3.5-vision-instructMicrosoft43.9%2.6%39CAug 11, 2026
39OPGPT-3.5 TurboOpenAI0.0%0.0%39BAug 11, 2026

MathVista Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

MathVista

MathVista Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Seed 2.1 Pro90.7%Rank #2Seed 2.1 Turbo90.5%Rank #3o386.8%Rank #4o4-mini84.3%

What is MathVista?

What MathVista measures and how its scores work.

MathVista evaluates mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts. It consists of 6,141 examples derived from 28 existing multimodal datasets and 3 newly created datasets (IQTest, FunctionQA, and PaperQA), combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess models' ability to understand complex figures and perform rigorous reasoning.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
MathVista
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
math
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
mathvista|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about MathVista.

Which model scores highest on MathVista?

Seed 2.1 Pro is currently ranked first with 90.7%.

What does MathVista measure?

MathVista evaluates mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts. It consists of 6,141 examples derived from 28 existing multimodal datasets and 3 newly created datasets (IQTest, FunctionQA, and PaperQA), combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess models' ability to understand complex figures and perform rigorous reasoning.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

39 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.

Rankings

OverallCodingText ArenaPricing

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Benchmarks

All BenchmarksReasoningMathCoding

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai