agents benchmark
PinchBench evaluates coding agents on real-world agentic coding tasks, measuring both best-case and average performance across complex software engineering scenarios.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | NV | 90.0% | 100.0% | 4 | C | |
| 2 | XI | 81.2% | 66.7% | 4 | C | |
| 3 | XI | 81.0% | 33.3% | 4 | C | |
| 4 | ZA | 80.7% | 0.0% | 4 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
PinchBench evaluates coding agents on real-world agentic coding tasks, measuring both best-case and average performance across complex software engineering scenarios.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about PinchBench.
Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) is currently ranked first with 90.0%.
PinchBench evaluates coding agents on real-world agentic coding tasks, measuring both best-case and average performance across complex software engineering scenarios.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
4 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.