agents benchmark
NL2Repo evaluates long-horizon coding capabilities including repository-level understanding, where models must generate or modify code across entire repositories from natural language specifications.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | AC | 55.9% | 100.0% | 14 | C | |
| 2 | DE | 54.2% | 92.3% | 14 | C | |
| 3 | ZA | 48.9% | 84.6% | 14 | C | |
| 4 | AC | 47.2% | 76.9% | 14 | C | |
| 5 | BY | 47.0% | 69.2% | 14 | C | |
| 6 | TE | 45.6% | 61.5% | 14 | C | |
| 7 | BY | 43.7% | 53.9% | 14 | C | |
| 8 | ZA | 42.7% | 46.1% | 14 | C | |
| 9 | MI | 42.1% | 38.5% | 14 | C | |
| 10 | AC | 41.1% | 30.8% | 14 | C | |
| 11 | MI | 39.8% | 23.1% | 14 | C | |
| 12 | AC | 37.9% | 15.4% | 14 | C | |
| 13 | AC | 36.2% | 7.7% | 14 | C | |
| 14 | AC | 29.4% | 0.0% | 14 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
NL2Repo evaluates long-horizon coding capabilities including repository-level understanding, where models must generate or modify code across entire repositories from natural language specifications.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about NL2Repo.
Qwen3.8 Max is currently ranked first with 55.9%.
NL2Repo evaluates long-horizon coding capabilities including repository-level understanding, where models must generate or modify code across entire repositories from natural language specifications.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
14 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.