language benchmark
MultiPL-E is a scalable and extensible system for translating unit test-driven code generation benchmarks to multiple programming languages. It extends HumanEval and MBPP Python benchmarks to 18 additional programming languages, enabling evaluation of neural code generation models across diverse programming paradigms and language features.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | AC | 87.9% | 100.0% | 13 | C | |
| 2 | AC | 87.8% | 91.7% | 13 | C | |
| 3 | AC | 86.1% | 83.3% | 13 | C | |
| 4 | MA | 85.7% | 75.0% | 13 | C | |
| 5 | MA | 85.7% | 66.7% | 13 | C | |
| 6 | AC | 75.4% | 58.3% | 13 | C | |
| 7 | AC | 75.1% | 50.0% | 13 | C | |
| 8 | AC | 72.8% | 41.7% | 13 | C | |
| 9 | AC | 70.4% | 33.3% | 13 | C | |
| 10 | AC | 69.2% | 25.0% | 13 | C | |
| 11 | AC | 65.9% | 16.7% | 13 | C | |
| 12 | AC | 65.8% | 8.3% | 13 | C | |
| 13 | AC | 59.1% | 0.0% | 13 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
MultiPL-E is a scalable and extensible system for translating unit test-driven code generation benchmarks to multiple programming languages. It extends HumanEval and MBPP Python benchmarks to 18 additional programming languages, enabling evaluation of neural code generation models across diverse programming paradigms and language features.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about MultiPL-E.
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is currently ranked first with 87.9%.
MultiPL-E is a scalable and extensible system for translating unit test-driven code generation benchmarks to multiple programming languages. It extends HumanEval and MBPP Python benchmarks to 18 additional programming languages, enabling evaluation of neural code generation models across diverse programming paradigms and language features.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
13 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is marked as eligible for the current LLMBoard capability methodology.