language benchmark
MultiPL-E is a scalable and extensible approach to benchmarking neural code generation that translates unit test-driven code generation benchmarks across multiple programming languages. It extends the HumanEval benchmark to 18 additional programming languages, enabling evaluation of code generation models across diverse programming paradigms and providing insights into how models generalize programming knowledge across language boundaries.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | ME | 75.2% | 100.0% | 3 | C | |
| 2 | ME | 65.5% | 50.0% | 3 | C | |
| 3 | ME | 50.8% | 0.0% | 3 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
MultiPL-E is a scalable and extensible approach to benchmarking neural code generation that translates unit test-driven code generation benchmarks across multiple programming languages. It extends the HumanEval benchmark to 18 additional programming languages, enabling evaluation of code generation models across diverse programming paradigms and providing insights into how models generalize programming knowledge across language boundaries.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about Multipl-E HumanEval.
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is currently ranked first with 75.2%.
MultiPL-E is a scalable and extensible approach to benchmarking neural code generation that translates unit test-driven code generation benchmarks across multiple programming languages. It extends the HumanEval benchmark to 18 additional programming languages, enabling evaluation of code generation models across diverse programming paradigms and providing insights into how models generalize programming knowledge across language boundaries.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
3 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.