reasoning benchmark
MMLU-ProX is a comprehensive multilingual benchmark covering 29 typologically diverse languages, building upon MMLU-Pro. Each language version consists of 11,829 identical questions enabling direct cross-linguistic comparisons. The benchmark evaluates large language models' reasoning capabilities across linguistic and cultural boundaries through challenging, reasoning-focused questions with 10 answer choices.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | OP | 80.7% | 100.0% | 5 | C | |
| 2 | MA | 74.2% | 75.0% | 5 | C | |
| 3 | MA | 70.6% | 50.0% | 5 | C | |
| 4 | MA | 65.2% | 25.0% | 5 | C | |
| 5 | MI | 49.3% | 0.0% | 5 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
MMLU-ProX is a comprehensive multilingual benchmark covering 29 typologically diverse languages, building upon MMLU-Pro. Each language version consists of 11,829 identical questions enabling direct cross-linguistic comparisons. The benchmark evaluates large language models' reasoning capabilities across linguistic and cultural boundaries through challenging, reasoning-focused questions with 10 answer choices.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about Multilingual MMLU.
o3-mini is currently ranked first with 80.7%.
MMLU-ProX is a comprehensive multilingual benchmark covering 29 typologically diverse languages, building upon MMLU-Pro. Each language version consists of 11,829 identical questions enabling direct cross-linguistic comparisons. The benchmark evaluates large language models' reasoning capabilities across linguistic and cultural boundaries through challenging, reasoning-focused questions with 10 answer choices.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
5 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.