reasoning benchmark
A multilingual benchmark for issue resolving that evaluates Large Language Models' ability to resolve software issues across diverse programming ecosystems. Covers 7 programming languages (Java, TypeScript, JavaScript, Go, Rust, C, and C++) with 1,632 high-quality instances carefully annotated by 68 expert annotators. Addresses limitations of existing benchmarks that focus almost exclusively on Python.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | MI | 52.7% | 100.0% | 6 | C | |
| 2 | MI | 51.3% | 80.0% | 6 | C | |
| 3 | MI | 49.4% | 60.0% | 6 | C | |
| 4 | MA | 41.9% | 40.0% | 6 | C | |
| 5 | MI | 36.2% | 20.0% | 6 | C | |
| 6 | AC | 25.8% | 0.0% | 6 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
A multilingual benchmark for issue resolving that evaluates Large Language Models' ability to resolve software issues across diverse programming ecosystems. Covers 7 programming languages (Java, TypeScript, JavaScript, Go, Rust, C, and C++) with 1,632 high-quality instances carefully annotated by 68 expert annotators. Addresses limitations of existing benchmarks that focus almost exclusively on Python.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about Multi-SWE-Bench.
MiniMax M2.7 is currently ranked first with 52.7%.
A multilingual benchmark for issue resolving that evaluates Large Language Models' ability to resolve software issues across diverse programming ecosystems. Covers 7 programming languages (Java, TypeScript, JavaScript, Go, Rust, C, and C++) with 1,632 high-quality instances carefully annotated by 68 expert annotators. Addresses limitations of existing benchmarks that focus almost exclusively on Python.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
6 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.