math benchmark
Extended version of MMLU-Pro providing additional challenging multiple-choice questions for evaluating language models across diverse academic and professional domains. Built on the foundation of the Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark framework.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
Extended version of MMLU-Pro providing additional challenging multiple-choice questions for evaluating language models across diverse academic and professional domains. Built on the foundation of the Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark framework.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about MMLU-ProX.
Qwen3.7 Max is currently ranked first with 87.0%.
Extended version of MMLU-Pro providing additional challenging multiple-choice questions for evaluating language models across diverse academic and professional domains. Built on the foundation of the Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark framework.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
32 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is marked as eligible for the current LLMBoard capability methodology.