math benchmark
Chain-of-Thought variant of the Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark, evaluating language models across 57 tasks including elementary mathematics, US history, computer science, law, and other professional and academic subjects. This version uses chain-of-thought prompting to elicit step-by-step reasoning.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | ME | 88.6% | 100.0% | 3 | C | |
| 2 | ME | 86.0% | 50.0% | 3 | C | |
| 3 | ME | 73.0% | 0.0% | 3 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
Chain-of-Thought variant of the Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark, evaluating language models across 57 tasks including elementary mathematics, US history, computer science, law, and other professional and academic subjects. This version uses chain-of-thought prompting to elicit step-by-step reasoning.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about MMLU (CoT).
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is currently ranked first with 88.6%.
Chain-of-Thought variant of the Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark, evaluating language models across 57 tasks including elementary mathematics, US history, computer science, law, and other professional and academic subjects. This version uses chain-of-thought prompting to elicit step-by-step reasoning.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
3 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.