general benchmark
MLVU-M benchmark
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | AC | 82.1% | 100.0% | 8 | C | |
| 2 | AC | 81.3% | 85.7% | 8 | C | |
| 3 | AC | 78.9% | 71.4% | 8 | C | |
| 4 | AC | 78.1% | 57.1% | 8 | C | |
| 5 | AC | 75.7% | 42.9% | 8 | C | |
| 6 | AC | 75.3% | 28.6% | 8 | C | |
| 7 | AC | 75.1% | 14.3% | 8 | C | |
| 8 | AC | 74.6% | 0.0% | 8 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
MLVU-M benchmark
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about MLVU-M.
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is currently ranked first with 82.1%.
MLVU-M benchmark
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
8 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.