reasoning benchmark
MLQA as part of the MEGA (Multilingual Evaluation of Generative AI) benchmark suite. A multi-way aligned extractive QA evaluation benchmark for cross-lingual question answering across 7 languages (English, Arabic, German, Spanish, Hindi, Vietnamese, and Simplified Chinese) with over 12K QA instances in English and 5K in each other language.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | MI | 65.3% | 100.0% | 2 | C | |
| 2 | MI | 61.7% | 0.0% | 2 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
MLQA as part of the MEGA (Multilingual Evaluation of Generative AI) benchmark suite. A multi-way aligned extractive QA evaluation benchmark for cross-lingual question answering across 7 languages (English, Arabic, German, Spanish, Hindi, Vietnamese, and Simplified Chinese) with over 12K QA instances in English and 5K in each other language.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about MEGA MLQA.
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is currently ranked first with 65.3%.
MLQA as part of the MEGA (Multilingual Evaluation of Generative AI) benchmark suite. A multi-way aligned extractive QA evaluation benchmark for cross-lingual question answering across 7 languages (English, Arabic, German, Spanish, Hindi, Vietnamese, and Simplified Chinese) with over 12K QA instances in English and 5K in each other language.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.