reasoning benchmark
The Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB) is Harvey's open-source benchmark for evaluating AI agents on complex, long-horizon legal work. Tasks are scored under an all-pass standard against expert-curated rubrics, where a task passes only if every required rubric criterion (facts, conclusions, citations, structure, and analytical moves) passes.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | AN | 13.3% | 100.0% | 13 | C | |
| 2 | AN | 11.7% | 91.7% | 13 | C | |
| 3 | AN | 7.1% | 83.3% | 13 | B | |
| 4 | AN | 5.8% | 75.0% | 13 | C | |
| 5 | AN | 5.4% | 66.7% | 13 | B | |
| 6 | AN | 4.2% | 58.3% | 13 | B | |
| 7 | OP | 2.1% | 50.0% | 13 | B | |
| 8 | GO | 0.8% | 41.7% | 13 | B | |
| 9 | OP | 0.4% | 33.3% | 13 | B | |
| 10 | GO | 0.0% | 25.0% | 13 | B | |
| 11 | GO | 0.0% | 16.7% | 13 | B | |
| 12 | GO | 0.0% | 8.3% | 13 | B | |
| 13 | OP | 0.0% | 0.0% | 13 | B |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
The Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB) is Harvey's open-source benchmark for evaluating AI agents on complex, long-horizon legal work. Tasks are scored under an all-pass standard against expert-curated rubrics, where a task passes only if every required rubric criterion (facts, conclusions, citations, structure, and analytical moves) passes.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about Legal Agent Benchmark.
Claude Fable 5 is currently ranked first with 13.3%.
The Legal Agent Benchmark (LAB) is Harvey's open-source benchmark for evaluating AI agents on complex, long-horizon legal work. Tasks are scored under an all-pass standard against expert-curated rubrics, where a task passes only if every required rubric criterion (facts, conclusions, citations, structure, and analytical moves) passes.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
13 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.