general benchmark
Instruct HumanEval
Instruction-based variant of HumanEval benchmark for evaluating large language models' code generation capabilities with functional correctness using pass@k metric on programming problems
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Models1
Model coverage1
MetricScore
EvidenceB
Instruct HumanEval Ranking
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 1 | NV | 73.8% | 100.0% | 1 | C |
Instruct HumanEval Highlights
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What is Instruct HumanEval?
What Instruct HumanEval measures and how its scores work.
Instruction-based variant of HumanEval benchmark for evaluating large language models' code generation capabilities with functional correctness using pass@k metric on programming problems
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
- Family
- Instruct HumanEval
- Modality
- text
- Primary category
- general
- Score direction
- higher
- LLMBoard eligible
- No
- Evaluation key
- instruct-humaneval|llm-stats-current
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
FAQ
Common questions about Instruct HumanEval.
Which model scores highest on Instruct HumanEval?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is currently ranked first with 73.8%.
What does Instruct HumanEval measure?
Instruction-based variant of HumanEval benchmark for evaluating large language models' code generation capabilities with functional correctness using pass@k metric on programming problems
Is a higher score better?
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
How many models are compared?
1 model results are currently shown.
Does this benchmark affect the overall score?
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.