reasoning benchmark
A graph reasoning benchmark that evaluates language models' ability to find parent nodes in graphs with context length under 128k tokens, requiring understanding of graph structure and edge relationships.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 2 | OP | 89.8% | 94.1% | 18 | C | |
| 3 | OP | 89.0% | 88.2% | 18 | C | |
| 5 | OP | 73.3% | 76.5% | 18 | C | |
| 6 | OP | 72.6% | 70.6% | 18 | C | |
| 7 | OP | 71.5% | 64.7% | 18 | C | |
| 8 | OP | 60.5% | 58.8% | 18 | C | |
| 10 | OP | 58.3% | 47.1% | 18 | C | |
| 11 | OP | 58.0% | 41.2% | 18 | C | |
| 12 | OP | 50.8% | 35.3% | 18 | C | |
| 13 | OP | 35.4% | 29.4% | 18 | C | |
| 17 | OP | 9.4% | 5.9% | 18 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
A graph reasoning benchmark that evaluates language models' ability to find parent nodes in graphs with context length under 128k tokens, requiring understanding of graph structure and edge relationships.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about Graphwalks parents <128k.
GPT-5.4 is currently ranked first with 89.8%.
A graph reasoning benchmark that evaluates language models' ability to find parent nodes in graphs with context length under 128k tokens, requiring understanding of graph structure and edge relationships.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
11 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is marked as eligible for the current LLMBoard capability methodology.