reasoning benchmark
Embodied Reasoning Question Answering benchmark consisting of 400 multiple-choice visual questions across spatial reasoning, trajectory reasoning, action reasoning, state estimation, and multi-view reasoning for evaluating AI capabilities in physical world interactions
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
Embodied Reasoning Question Answering benchmark consisting of 400 multiple-choice visual questions across spatial reasoning, trajectory reasoning, action reasoning, state estimation, and multi-view reasoning for evaluating AI capabilities in physical world interactions
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level C.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about ERQA.
Qwen3.8 Max is currently ranked first with 77.8%.
Embodied Reasoning Question Answering benchmark consisting of 400 multiple-choice visual questions across spatial reasoning, trajectory reasoning, action reasoning, state estimation, and multi-view reasoning for evaluating AI capabilities in physical world interactions
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
23 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.