reasoning benchmark
A multilingual closed-book question answering dataset that evaluates cross-lingual knowledge transfer in large language models across 12 languages, using knowledge-seeking questions based on Wikipedia articles that exist only in one language
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | GO | 19.0% | 100.0% | 8 | C | |
| 2 | GO | 16.7% | 85.7% | 8 | C | |
| 3 | GO | 10.3% | 71.4% | 8 | C | |
| 4 | GO | 4.6% | 57.1% | 8 | C | |
| 5 | GO | 2.5% | 42.9% | 8 | C | |
| 6 | GO | 2.5% | 28.6% | 8 | C | |
| 7 | GO | 1.9% | 14.3% | 8 | C | |
| 8 | GO | 1.4% | 0.0% | 8 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
A multilingual closed-book question answering dataset that evaluates cross-lingual knowledge transfer in large language models across 12 languages, using knowledge-seeking questions based on Wikipedia articles that exist only in one language
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about ECLeKTic.
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is currently ranked first with 19.0%.
A multilingual closed-book question answering dataset that evaluates cross-lingual knowledge transfer in large language models across 12 languages, using knowledge-seeking questions based on Wikipedia articles that exist only in one language
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
8 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.