agents benchmark
Claw-Eval tests real-world agentic task completion across complex multi-step scenarios, evaluating a model's ability to use tools, navigate environments, and complete end-to-end tasks autonomously.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | MA | 80.9% | 100.0% | 13 | C | |
| 2 | ZA | 75.0% | 91.7% | 13 | C | |
| 3 | MI | 74.5% | 83.3% | 13 | C | |
| 4 | TE | 68.5% | 75.0% | 13 | C | |
| 5 | AC | 65.2% | 66.7% | 13 | C | |
| 6 | XI | 64.0% | 58.3% | 13 | C | |
| 7 | XI | 63.2% | 50.0% | 13 | C | |
| 8 | AC | 62.7% | 41.7% | 13 | C | |
| 9 | XI | 61.5% | 33.3% | 13 | C | |
| 10 | AC | 60.6% | 25.0% | 13 | C | |
| 11 | AC | 58.7% | 16.7% | 13 | C | |
| 12 | XI | 54.8% | 8.3% | 13 | C | |
| 13 | AC | 50.0% | 0.0% | 13 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
Claw-Eval tests real-world agentic task completion across complex multi-step scenarios, evaluating a model's ability to use tools, navigate environments, and complete end-to-end tasks autonomously.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about Claw-Eval.
Kimi K2.6 is currently ranked first with 80.9%.
Claw-Eval tests real-world agentic task completion across complex multi-step scenarios, evaluating a model's ability to use tools, navigate environments, and complete end-to-end tasks autonomously.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
13 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.