llmboard.ai
Benchmarks
CompareRankings
llmboard.ai
Benchmarks
CompareRankings
HomeBenchmarksreasoningBrowseComp

reasoning benchmark

BrowseComp

BrowseComp is a benchmark comprising 1,266 questions that challenge AI agents to persistently navigate the internet in search of hard-to-find, entangled information. The benchmark measures agents' ability to exercise persistence in information gathering, demonstrate creativity in web navigation, and find concise, verifiable answers. Despite the difficulty of the questions, BrowseComp is simple and easy-to-use, as predicted answers are short and easily verifiable against reference answers.

Updated Aug 7, 2026

Published models58
Registry coverage58
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Distribution
  • Highlights
  • About
  • FAQ

BrowseComp leaderboard

Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.

58 rows
Columns

Show columns

1MAKimi K3Moonshot AI91.2%100.0%58CAug 7, 2026
2ANClaude Opus 5Anthropic90.8%98.3%58CAug 7, 2026
3OPGPT-5.6 SolOpenAI90.4%96.5%58CAug 7, 2026
4OPGPT-5.5 ProOpenAI90.1%94.7%58CAug 7, 2026
5OPGPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI87.5%93.0%58CAug 7, 2026
6ANClaude Mythos PreviewAnthropic86.9%91.2%58CAug 7, 2026
7MAKimi K2.6Moonshot AI86.3%89.5%58CAug 7, 2026
8BYSeed 2.1 ProByteDance86.2%87.7%58CAug 7, 2026
9GOGemini 3.1 ProGoogle85.9%86.0%58CAug 7, 2026
10BYSeed 2.1 TurboByteDance84.9%84.2%58CAug 7, 2026
11ANClaude Sonnet 5Anthropic84.7%82.5%58CAug 7, 2026
12OPGPT-5.5OpenAI84.4%80.7%58CAug 7, 2026
13ANClaude Opus 4.8Anthropic84.3%79.0%58CAug 7, 2026
14TEHy3Tencent84.2%77.2%58CAug 7, 2026
15ANClaude Opus 4.6Anthropic84.0%75.4%58CAug 7, 2026
16MIMiniMax M3MiniMax83.5%73.7%58CAug 7, 2026
17DEDeepSeek-V4-Pro-MaxDeepSeek83.4%71.9%58CAug 7, 2026
18OPGPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI83.3%70.2%58CAug 7, 2026
19OPGPT-5.4OpenAI82.7%68.4%58CAug 7, 2026
20ANClaude Opus 4.7Anthropic79.3%66.7%58CAug 7, 2026
21ZAGLM-5.1Zhipu AI79.3%64.9%58CAug 7, 2026
22OPGPT-5.2 ProOpenAI77.9%63.2%58CAug 7, 2026
23BYSeed 2.0 ProByteDance77.3%61.4%58CAug 7, 2026
24MIMiniMax M2.5MiniMax76.3%59.6%58CAug 7, 2026
25ZAGLM-5Zhipu AI75.9%57.9%58CAug 7, 2026
26MAKimi K2.5Moonshot AI74.9%56.1%58CAug 7, 2026
27ANClaude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic74.7%54.4%58CAug 7, 2026
28DEDeepSeek-V4-Flash-MaxDeepSeek73.2%52.6%58CAug 7, 2026
29ACQwen3.5-397B-A17BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team69.0%50.9%58CAug 7, 2026
30STStep-3.5-FlashStepFun69.0%49.1%58CAug 7, 2026
31OPGPT-5.2OpenAI65.8%47.4%58CAug 7, 2026
32ACQwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team63.8%45.6%58CAug 7, 2026
33MIMiniMax M2.1MiniMax62.0%43.9%58CAug 7, 2026
34ACQwen3.5-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team61.0%42.1%58CAug 7, 2026
35ACQwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team61.0%40.4%58CAug 7, 2026
36MAKimi K2-Thinking-0905Moonshot AI60.2%38.6%58CAug 7, 2026
37XIMiMo-V2-FlashXiaomi58.3%36.8%58CAug 7, 2026
38MELongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601Meituan56.6%35.1%58CAug 7, 2026
39OPGPT-5OpenAI54.9%33.3%58CAug 7, 2026
40ZAGLM-4.7Zhipu AI52.0%31.6%58CAug 7, 2026
41OPo4-miniOpenAI51.5%29.8%58CAug 7, 2026
42DEDeepSeek-V3.2 (Thinking)DeepSeek51.4%28.1%58CAug 7, 2026
43DEDeepSeek-V3.2DeepSeek51.4%26.3%58CAug 7, 2026
44OPo3OpenAI49.7%24.6%58CAug 7, 2026
45SASarvam-105BSarvam AI49.5%22.8%58CAug 7, 2026
46MAMistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI48.6%21.1%58CAug 7, 2026
47ZAGLM-4.6Zhipu AI45.1%19.3%58CAug 7, 2026
48XAGrok 4 FastxAI44.9%17.5%58CAug 7, 2026
49NVNemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)NVIDIA44.4%15.8%58CAug 7, 2026
50MIMiniMax M2MiniMax44.0%14.0%58CAug 7, 2026
51ZAGLM-4.7-FlashZhipu AI42.8%12.3%58CAug 7, 2026
52DEDeepSeek-V3.2-ExpDeepSeek40.1%10.5%58CAug 7, 2026
53SASarvam-30BSarvam AI35.5%8.8%58CAug 7, 2026
54NVNemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)NVIDIA31.3%7.0%58CAug 7, 2026
55DEDeepSeek-V3.1DeepSeek30.0%5.3%58CAug 7, 2026
56ZAGLM-4.5Zhipu AI26.4%3.5%58CAug 7, 2026
57ZAGLM-4.5-AirZhipu AI21.3%1.8%58CAug 7, 2026
58DEDeepSeek-R1-0528DeepSeek8.9%0.0%58CAug 7, 2026

Score distribution

Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.

BrowseComp

BrowseComp highlights

The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.

Rank #1Kimi K391.2%Rank #2Claude Opus 590.8%Rank #3GPT-5.6 Sol90.4%Rank #4GPT-5.5 Pro90.1%

What is BrowseComp?

Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.

BrowseComp is a benchmark comprising 1,266 questions that challenge AI agents to persistently navigate the internet in search of hard-to-find, entangled information. The benchmark measures agents' ability to exercise persistence in information gathering, demonstrate creativity in web navigation, and find concise, verifiable answers. Despite the difficulty of the questions, BrowseComp is simple and easy-to-use, as predicted answers are short and easily verifiable against reference answers.

Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.

Family
BrowseComp
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
browsecomp|llm-stats-current

Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.

FAQ

Common questions about BrowseComp.

Which model scores highest on BrowseComp?

Kimi K3 is currently ranked first with 91.2%.

What does BrowseComp measure?

BrowseComp is a benchmark comprising 1,266 questions that challenge AI agents to persistently navigate the internet in search of hard-to-find, entangled information. The benchmark measures agents' ability to exercise persistence in information gathering, demonstrate creativity in web navigation, and find concise, verifiable answers. Despite the difficulty of the questions, BrowseComp is simple and easy-to-use, as predicted answers are short and easily verifiable against reference answers.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

58 unique published model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

This benchmark is marked as eligible for the current LLMBoard capability methodology.

Rankings

OverallCodingText ArenaPricing

Modalities

Image GenerationVideo GenerationSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Benchmarks

All BenchmarksReasoningMathCoding

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai