math benchmark
BIG-Bench Hard (BBH) is a subset of 23 challenging BIG-Bench tasks selected because prior language model evaluations did not outperform average human-rater performance. The benchmark contains 6,511 evaluation examples testing various forms of multi-step reasoning including arithmetic, logical reasoning (Boolean expressions, logical deduction), geometric reasoning, temporal reasoning, and language understanding. Tasks require capabilities such as causal judgment, object counting, navigation, pattern recognition, and complex problem solving.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | AN | 93.1% | 100.0% | 21 | C | |
| 2 | AN | 93.1% | 95.0% | 21 | C | |
| 3 | GO | 89.2% | 90.0% | 21 | C | |
| 4 | GO | 87.6% | 85.0% | 21 | C | |
| 5 | AN | 86.8% | 80.0% | 21 | C | |
| 6 | GO | 85.7% | 75.0% | 21 | C | |
| 7 | GO | 85.5% | 70.0% | 21 | C | |
| 8 | AN | 82.9% | 65.0% | 21 | C | |
| 9 | MI | 79.1% | 60.0% | 21 | C | |
| 10 | AN | 73.7% | 55.0% | 21 | C | |
| 11 | GO | 72.2% | 50.0% | 21 | C | |
| 12 | MI | 70.4% | 45.0% | 21 | C | |
| 13 | IB | 69.1% | 40.0% | 21 | C | |
| 14 | IB | 69.1% | 35.0% | 21 | C | |
| 15 | MI | 69.0% | 30.0% | 21 | C | |
| 16 | IB | 55.7% | 25.0% | 21 | C | |
| 17 | GO | 52.9% | 20.0% | 21 | C | |
| 18 | GO | 52.9% | 15.0% | 21 | C | |
| 19 | GO | 44.3% | 10.0% | 21 | C | |
| 20 | GO | 44.3% | 5.0% | 21 | C | |
| 21 | GO | 39.1% | 0.0% | 21 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
BIG-Bench Hard (BBH) is a subset of 23 challenging BIG-Bench tasks selected because prior language model evaluations did not outperform average human-rater performance. The benchmark contains 6,511 evaluation examples testing various forms of multi-step reasoning including arithmetic, logical reasoning (Boolean expressions, logical deduction), geometric reasoning, temporal reasoning, and language understanding. Tasks require capabilities such as causal judgment, object counting, navigation, pattern recognition, and complex problem solving.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about BIG-Bench Hard.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is currently ranked first with 93.1%.
BIG-Bench Hard (BBH) is a subset of 23 challenging BIG-Bench tasks selected because prior language model evaluations did not outperform average human-rater performance. The benchmark contains 6,511 evaluation examples testing various forms of multi-step reasoning including arithmetic, logical reasoning (Boolean expressions, logical deduction), geometric reasoning, temporal reasoning, and language understanding. Tasks require capabilities such as causal judgment, object counting, navigation, pattern recognition, and complex problem solving.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
21 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is marked as eligible for the current LLMBoard capability methodology.