legal benchmark
A comprehensive benchmark for evaluating large language models' generative writing capabilities across 6 core writing domains (Academic & Engineering, Finance & Business, Politics & Law, Literature & Art, Education, Advertising & Marketing) and 100 subdomains. Contains 1,239 queries with a query-dependent evaluation framework that dynamically generates 5 instance-specific assessment criteria for each writing task, using a fine-tuned critic model to score responses on style, format, and length dimensions.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | AC | 88.3% | 100.0% | 15 | C | |
| 2 | AC | 87.3% | 92.9% | 15 | C | |
| 3 | AC | 86.7% | 85.7% | 15 | C | |
| 4 | AC | 86.2% | 78.6% | 15 | C | |
| 5 | AC | 85.5% | 71.4% | 15 | C | |
| 6 | AC | 85.5% | 64.3% | 15 | C | |
| 7 | AC | 85.2% | 57.1% | 15 | C | |
| 8 | AC | 85.2% | 50.0% | 15 | C | |
| 9 | AC | 84.6% | 42.9% | 15 | C | |
| 10 | AC | 84.0% | 35.7% | 15 | C | |
| 11 | AC | 83.1% | 28.6% | 15 | C | |
| 12 | AC | 82.9% | 21.4% | 15 | C | |
| 13 | AC | 82.6% | 14.3% | 15 | C | |
| 14 | AC | 82.5% | 7.1% | 15 | C | |
| 15 | MA | 73.8% | 0.0% | 15 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
A comprehensive benchmark for evaluating large language models' generative writing capabilities across 6 core writing domains (Academic & Engineering, Finance & Business, Politics & Law, Literature & Art, Education, Advertising & Marketing) and 100 subdomains. Contains 1,239 queries with a query-dependent evaluation framework that dynamically generates 5 instance-specific assessment criteria for each writing task, using a fine-tuned critic model to score responses on style, format, and length dimensions.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about WritingBench.
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is currently ranked first with 88.3%.
A comprehensive benchmark for evaluating large language models' generative writing capabilities across 6 core writing domains (Academic & Engineering, Finance & Business, Politics & Law, Literature & Art, Education, Advertising & Marketing) and 100 subdomains. Contains 1,239 queries with a query-dependent evaluation framework that dynamically generates 5 instance-specific assessment criteria for each writing task, using a fine-tuned critic model to score responses on style, format, and length dimensions.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
15 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is marked as eligible for the current LLMBoard capability methodology.