agents benchmark
WildClawBench
WildClawBench is an agentic coding benchmark from InternLM/Claw-Eval that reports overall model performance on real-world tool-using development tasks.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Models5
Model coverage5
MetricScore
EvidenceB
WildClawBench Ranking
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 1 | BY | 62.8% | 100.0% | 5 | C | |
| 2 | BY | 61.7% | 75.0% | 5 | C | |
| 3 | TE | 53.6% | 50.0% | 5 | C | |
| 4 | ME | 47.6% | 25.0% | 5 | C | |
| 5 | XI | 43.0% | 0.0% | 5 | C |
WildClawBench Score Distribution
A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.
WildClawBench Highlights
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What is WildClawBench?
What WildClawBench measures and how its scores work.
WildClawBench is an agentic coding benchmark from InternLM/Claw-Eval that reports overall model performance on real-world tool-using development tasks.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
- Family
- WildClawBench
- Modality
- text
- Primary category
- agents
- Score direction
- higher
- LLMBoard eligible
- Yes
- Evaluation key
- wildclawbench|llm-stats-current
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
FAQ
Common questions about WildClawBench.
Which model scores highest on WildClawBench?
Seed 2.1 Turbo is currently ranked first with 62.8%.
What does WildClawBench measure?
WildClawBench is an agentic coding benchmark from InternLM/Claw-Eval that reports overall model performance on real-world tool-using development tasks.
Is a higher score better?
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
How many models are compared?
5 model results are currently shown.
Does this benchmark affect the overall score?
Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.