reasoning benchmark
WideSearch is an agentic search benchmark that evaluates models' ability to perform broad, parallel search operations across multiple sources. It tests wide-coverage information retrieval and synthesis capabilities.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | MA | 80.8% | 100.0% | 9 | C | |
| 2 | MA | 79.0% | 87.5% | 9 | C | |
| 3 | TE | 76.4% | 75.0% | 9 | C | |
| 4 | AC | 74.3% | 62.5% | 9 | C | |
| 5 | AC | 74.0% | 50.0% | 9 | C | |
| 6 | AC | 61.1% | 37.5% | 9 | C | |
| 7 | AC | 60.5% | 25.0% | 9 | C | |
| 8 | AC | 60.1% | 12.5% | 9 | C | |
| 9 | AC | 57.1% | 0.0% | 9 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
WideSearch is an agentic search benchmark that evaluates models' ability to perform broad, parallel search operations across multiple sources. It tests wide-coverage information retrieval and synthesis capabilities.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about WideSearch.
Kimi K2.6 is currently ranked first with 80.8%.
WideSearch is an agentic search benchmark that evaluates models' ability to perform broad, parallel search operations across multiple sources. It tests wide-coverage information retrieval and synthesis capabilities.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
9 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.