math benchmark
We-Math
We-Math evaluates multimodal models on visual mathematical reasoning, requiring models to understand and solve math problems presented with visual elements such as diagrams, charts, and geometric figures.
Updated Aug 11, 2026
Models1
Model coverage1
MetricScore
EvidenceB
We-Math Ranking
Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.
| 1 | AC | 89.0% | 100.0% | 1 | C |
We-Math Highlights
The leading models and scores on this benchmark.
What is We-Math?
What We-Math measures and how its scores work.
We-Math evaluates multimodal models on visual mathematical reasoning, requiring models to understand and solve math problems presented with visual elements such as diagrams, charts, and geometric figures.
Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.
- Family
- We-Math
- Modality
- multimodal
- Primary category
- math
- Score direction
- higher
- LLMBoard eligible
- No
- Evaluation key
- we-math|llm-stats-current
Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.
FAQ
Common questions about We-Math.
Which model scores highest on We-Math?
Qwen3.6 Plus is currently ranked first with 89.0%.
What does We-Math measure?
We-Math evaluates multimodal models on visual mathematical reasoning, requiring models to understand and solve math problems presented with visual elements such as diagrams, charts, and geometric figures.
Is a higher score better?
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
How many models are compared?
1 model results are currently shown.
Does this benchmark affect the overall score?
No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.