multimodal benchmark
VQAv2 is a balanced Visual Question Answering dataset containing open-ended questions about images that require understanding of vision, language, and commonsense knowledge to answer. VQAv2 addresses bias issues from the original VQA dataset by collecting complementary images such that every question is associated with similar images that result in different answers, forcing models to actually understand visual content rather than relying on language priors.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | GO | 71.6% | 100.0% | 3 | C | |
| 2 | GO | 71.0% | 50.0% | 3 | C | |
| 3 | GO | 62.4% | 0.0% | 3 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
VQAv2 is a balanced Visual Question Answering dataset containing open-ended questions about images that require understanding of vision, language, and commonsense knowledge to answer. VQAv2 addresses bias issues from the original VQA dataset by collecting complementary images such that every question is associated with similar images that result in different answers, forcing models to actually understand visual content rather than relying on language priors.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about VQAv2 (val).
Gemma 3 12B is currently ranked first with 71.6%.
VQAv2 is a balanced Visual Question Answering dataset containing open-ended questions about images that require understanding of vision, language, and commonsense knowledge to answer. VQAv2 addresses bias issues from the original VQA dataset by collecting complementary images such that every question is associated with similar images that result in different answers, forcing models to actually understand visual content rather than relying on language priors.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
3 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.