multimodal benchmark
The first-ever comprehensive evaluation benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video analysis. Features 900 videos (254 hours) with 2,700 question-answer pairs covering 6 primary visual domains and 30 subfields. Evaluates temporal understanding across short (11 seconds) to long (1 hour) videos with multi-modal inputs including video frames, subtitles, and audio.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | AC | 90.4% | 100.0% | 10 | C | |
| 2 | AC | 87.7% | 88.9% | 10 | C | |
| 3 | AC | 87.3% | 77.8% | 10 | C | |
| 4 | AC | 87.0% | 66.7% | 10 | C | |
| 5 | OP | 86.7% | 55.6% | 10 | C | |
| 6 | AC | 86.6% | 44.4% | 10 | C | |
| 7 | AC | 86.6% | 33.3% | 10 | C | |
| 8 | AC | 77.9% | 22.2% | 10 | C | |
| 9 | AC | 72.4% | 11.1% | 10 | C | |
| 10 | AC | 71.6% | 0.0% | 10 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
The first-ever comprehensive evaluation benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video analysis. Features 900 videos (254 hours) with 2,700 question-answer pairs covering 6 primary visual domains and 30 subfields. Evaluates temporal understanding across short (11 seconds) to long (1 hour) videos with multi-modal inputs including video frames, subtitles, and audio.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about VideoMME w sub..
Qwen3.8 Max is currently ranked first with 90.4%.
The first-ever comprehensive evaluation benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video analysis. Features 900 videos (254 hours) with 2,700 question-answer pairs covering 6 primary visual domains and 30 subfields. Evaluates temporal understanding across short (11 seconds) to long (1 hour) videos with multi-modal inputs including video frames, subtitles, and audio.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
10 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.