llmboard.ai
Benchmarks
CompareRankings
llmboard.ai
Benchmarks
CompareRankings
HomeBenchmarksmultimodalVideoMME w sub.

multimodal benchmark

VideoMME w sub.

The first-ever comprehensive evaluation benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video analysis. Features 900 videos (254 hours) with 2,700 question-answer pairs covering 6 primary visual domains and 30 subfields. Evaluates temporal understanding across short (11 seconds) to long (1 hour) videos with multi-modal inputs including video frames, subtitles, and audio.

Updated Aug 7, 2026

Published models10
Registry coverage10
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Distribution
  • Highlights
  • About
  • FAQ

VideoMME w sub. leaderboard

Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.

10 rows
Columns

Show columns

1ACQwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team90.4%100.0%10CAug 7, 2026
2ACQwen3.6-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team87.7%88.9%10CAug 7, 2026
3ACQwen3.5-122B-A10BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team87.3%77.8%10CAug 7, 2026
4ACQwen3.5-27BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team87.0%66.7%10CAug 7, 2026
5OPGPT-5OpenAI86.7%55.6%10CAug 7, 2026
6ACQwen3.5-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team86.6%44.4%10CAug 7, 2026
7ACQwen3.6-35B-A3BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team86.6%33.3%10CAug 7, 2026
8ACQwen2.5 VL 32B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team77.9%22.2%10CAug 7, 2026
9ACQwen2.5-Omni-7BAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team72.4%11.1%10CAug 7, 2026
10ACQwen2.5 VL 7B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team71.6%0.0%10CAug 7, 2026

Score distribution

Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.

VideoMME w sub.

VideoMME w sub. highlights

The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.

Rank #1Qwen3.8 Max90.4%Rank #2Qwen3.6-27B87.7%Rank #3Qwen3.5-122B-A10B87.3%Rank #4Qwen3.5-27B87.0%

What is VideoMME w sub.?

Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.

The first-ever comprehensive evaluation benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video analysis. Features 900 videos (254 hours) with 2,700 question-answer pairs covering 6 primary visual domains and 30 subfields. Evaluates temporal understanding across short (11 seconds) to long (1 hour) videos with multi-modal inputs including video frames, subtitles, and audio.

Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.

Family
VideoMME w sub.
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
multimodal
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
videomme-w-sub.|llm-stats-current

Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.

FAQ

Common questions about VideoMME w sub..

Which model scores highest on VideoMME w sub.?

Qwen3.8 Max is currently ranked first with 90.4%.

What does VideoMME w sub. measure?

The first-ever comprehensive evaluation benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video analysis. Features 900 videos (254 hours) with 2,700 question-answer pairs covering 6 primary visual domains and 30 subfields. Evaluates temporal understanding across short (11 seconds) to long (1 hour) videos with multi-modal inputs including video frames, subtitles, and audio.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

10 unique published model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.

Rankings

OverallCodingText ArenaPricing

Modalities

Image GenerationVideo GenerationSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Benchmarks

All BenchmarksReasoningMathCoding

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai