multimodal benchmark
V*
A visual reasoning benchmark evaluating multimodal inference under challenging spatial and grounded tasks.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Published models7
Registry coverage7
MetricScore
EvidenceB
V* leaderboard
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | MA | 96.9% | 100.0% | 7 | C | |
| 2 | AC | 96.9% | 83.3% | 7 | C | |
| 3 | AC | 94.7% | 66.7% | 7 | C | |
| 4 | AC | 93.7% | 50.0% | 7 | C | |
| 5 | AC | 93.2% | 33.3% | 7 | C | |
| 6 | AC | 92.7% | 16.7% | 7 | C | |
| 7 | ZA | 89.0% | 0.0% | 7 | C |
Score distribution
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
V* highlights
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
What is V*?
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
A visual reasoning benchmark evaluating multimodal inference under challenging spatial and grounded tasks.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
- Family
- V*
- Modality
- multimodal
- Primary category
- multimodal
- Score direction
- higher
- LLMBoard eligible
- No
- Evaluation key
- v-star|llm-stats-current
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
FAQ
Common questions about V*.
Which model scores highest on V*?
Kimi K2.6 is currently ranked first with 96.9%.
What does V* measure?
A visual reasoning benchmark evaluating multimodal inference under challenging spatial and grounded tasks.
Is a higher score better?
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
How many models are compared?
7 unique published model results are currently shown.
Does this benchmark affect the overall score?
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.