math benchmark
A theorem-driven question answering dataset containing 800 high-quality questions covering 350+ theorems from Math, Physics, EE&CS, and Finance. Designed to evaluate AI models' capabilities to apply theorems to solve challenging university-level science problems.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | AC | 44.4% | 100.0% | 6 | C | |
| 2 | AC | 44.1% | 80.0% | 6 | C | |
| 3 | AC | 43.1% | 60.0% | 6 | C | |
| 4 | AC | 43.0% | 40.0% | 6 | C | |
| 5 | AC | 34.0% | 20.0% | 6 | C | |
| 6 | AC | 25.3% | 0.0% | 6 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
A theorem-driven question answering dataset containing 800 high-quality questions covering 350+ theorems from Math, Physics, EE&CS, and Finance. Designed to evaluate AI models' capabilities to apply theorems to solve challenging university-level science problems.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about TheoremQA.
Qwen2 72B Instruct is currently ranked first with 44.4%.
A theorem-driven question answering dataset containing 800 high-quality questions covering 350+ theorems from Math, Physics, EE&CS, and Finance. Designed to evaluate AI models' capabilities to apply theorems to solve challenging university-level science problems.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
6 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.