reasoning benchmark
A human-validated subset of SWE-bench that evaluates language models' ability to resolve real-world GitHub issues using an agentless approach. The benchmark tests models on software engineering problems requiring understanding and coordinating changes across multiple functions, classes, and files simultaneously.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | MA | 51.8% | 100.0% | 2 | C | |
| 2 | XI | 35.7% | 0.0% | 2 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
A human-validated subset of SWE-bench that evaluates language models' ability to resolve real-world GitHub issues using an agentless approach. The benchmark tests models on software engineering problems requiring understanding and coordinating changes across multiple functions, classes, and files simultaneously.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about SWE-bench Verified (Agentless).
Kimi K2 Instruct is currently ranked first with 51.8%.
A human-validated subset of SWE-bench that evaluates language models' ability to resolve real-world GitHub issues using an agentless approach. The benchmark tests models on software engineering problems requiring understanding and coordinating changes across multiple functions, classes, and files simultaneously.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.