summarization benchmark
SummScreenFD is the ForeverDreaming subset of the SummScreen dataset for abstractive screenplay summarization, comprising pairs of TV series transcripts and human-written recaps from 88 different shows. The dataset provides a challenging testbed for abstractive summarization where plot details are often expressed indirectly in character dialogues and scattered across the entirety of the transcript, requiring models to find and integrate these details to form succinct plot descriptions.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | MI | 16.9% | 100.0% | 2 | C | |
| 2 | MI | 16.0% | 0.0% | 2 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
SummScreenFD is the ForeverDreaming subset of the SummScreen dataset for abstractive screenplay summarization, comprising pairs of TV series transcripts and human-written recaps from 88 different shows. The dataset provides a challenging testbed for abstractive summarization where plot details are often expressed indirectly in character dialogues and scattered across the entirety of the transcript, requiring models to find and integrate these details to form succinct plot descriptions.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about SummScreenFD.
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is currently ranked first with 16.9%.
SummScreenFD is the ForeverDreaming subset of the SummScreen dataset for abstractive screenplay summarization, comprising pairs of TV series transcripts and human-written recaps from 88 different shows. The dataset provides a challenging testbed for abstractive summarization where plot details are often expressed indirectly in character dialogues and scattered across the entirety of the transcript, requiring models to find and integrate these details to form succinct plot descriptions.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.