summarization benchmark
QMSum is a benchmark for query-based multi-domain meeting summarization consisting of 1,808 query-summary pairs over 232 meetings across academic, product, and committee domains. The dataset enables models to select and summarize relevant spans of meetings in response to specific queries. Published at NAACL 2021, QMSum presents significant challenges in long meeting summarization where models must identify and summarize relevant content based on user queries.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | MI | 21.3% | 100.0% | 2 | C | |
| 2 | MI | 19.9% | 0.0% | 2 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
QMSum is a benchmark for query-based multi-domain meeting summarization consisting of 1,808 query-summary pairs over 232 meetings across academic, product, and committee domains. The dataset enables models to select and summarize relevant spans of meetings in response to specific queries. Published at NAACL 2021, QMSum presents significant challenges in long meeting summarization where models must identify and summarize relevant content based on user queries.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about QMSum.
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is currently ranked first with 21.3%.
QMSum is a benchmark for query-based multi-domain meeting summarization consisting of 1,808 query-summary pairs over 232 meetings across academic, product, and committee domains. The dataset enables models to select and summarize relevant spans of meetings in response to specific queries. Published at NAACL 2021, QMSum presents significant challenges in long meeting summarization where models must identify and summarize relevant content based on user queries.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.