reasoning benchmark
QASPER is a dataset of 5,049 information-seeking questions and answers anchored in 1,585 NLP research papers. Questions are written by NLP practitioners who read only titles and abstracts, while answers require understanding the full paper text and provide supporting evidence. The dataset challenges models with complex reasoning across document sections for academic document question answering. Each question seeks information present in the full text and is answered by a separate set of NLP practitioners who also provide supporting evidence to answers.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | MI | 41.9% | 100.0% | 2 | C | |
| 2 | MI | 40.0% | 0.0% | 2 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
QASPER is a dataset of 5,049 information-seeking questions and answers anchored in 1,585 NLP research papers. Questions are written by NLP practitioners who read only titles and abstracts, while answers require understanding the full paper text and provide supporting evidence. The dataset challenges models with complex reasoning across document sections for academic document question answering. Each question seeks information present in the full text and is answered by a separate set of NLP practitioners who also provide supporting evidence to answers.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about Qasper.
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is currently ranked first with 41.9%.
QASPER is a dataset of 5,049 information-seeking questions and answers anchored in 1,585 NLP research papers. Questions are written by NLP practitioners who read only titles and abstracts, while answers require understanding the full paper text and provide supporting evidence. The dataset challenges models with complex reasoning across document sections for academic document question answering. Each question seeks information present in the full text and is answered by a separate set of NLP practitioners who also provide supporting evidence to answers.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.