reasoning benchmark
PostTrainBench evaluates a model's ability to autonomously post-train base models. Given pretrain-only base models, the agent must complete the full pipeline of data synthesis, training, evaluation, and iteration within a time budget, scored across downstream benchmarks such as AIME2025, BFCL, GPQA Main, GSM8K, and HumanEval.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | MI | 37.1% | 100.0% | 5 | C | |
| 2 | MA | 36.6% | 75.0% | 5 | C | |
| 3 | ZA | 34.3% | 50.0% | 5 | C | |
| 4 | BY | 18.3% | 25.0% | 5 | C | |
| 5 | BY | 16.5% | 0.0% | 5 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
PostTrainBench evaluates a model's ability to autonomously post-train base models. Given pretrain-only base models, the agent must complete the full pipeline of data synthesis, training, evaluation, and iteration within a time budget, scored across downstream benchmarks such as AIME2025, BFCL, GPQA Main, GSM8K, and HumanEval.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about PostTrainBench.
MiniMax M3 is currently ranked first with 37.1%.
PostTrainBench evaluates a model's ability to autonomously post-train base models. Given pretrain-only base models, the agent must complete the full pipeline of data synthesis, training, evaluation, and iteration within a time budget, scored across downstream benchmarks such as AIME2025, BFCL, GPQA Main, GSM8K, and HumanEval.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
5 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.