multimodal benchmark
A novel multimodal video benchmark designed to evaluate perception and reasoning skills of pre-trained models across video, audio, and text modalities. Contains 11.6k real-world videos (average 23 seconds) filmed by participants worldwide, densely annotated with six types of labels. Focuses on skills (Memory, Abstraction, Physics, Semantics) and reasoning types (descriptive, explanatory, predictive, counterfactual). Shows significant performance gap between human baseline (91.4%) and state-of-the-art video QA models (46.2%).
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | AC | 73.2% | 100.0% | 2 | C | |
| 2 | AC | 70.5% | 0.0% | 2 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
A novel multimodal video benchmark designed to evaluate perception and reasoning skills of pre-trained models across video, audio, and text modalities. Contains 11.6k real-world videos (average 23 seconds) filmed by participants worldwide, densely annotated with six types of labels. Focuses on skills (Memory, Abstraction, Physics, Semantics) and reasoning types (descriptive, explanatory, predictive, counterfactual). Shows significant performance gap between human baseline (91.4%) and state-of-the-art video QA models (46.2%).
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about PerceptionTest.
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is currently ranked first with 73.2%.
A novel multimodal video benchmark designed to evaluate perception and reasoning skills of pre-trained models across video, audio, and text modalities. Contains 11.6k real-world videos (average 23 seconds) filmed by participants worldwide, densely annotated with six types of labels. Focuses on skills (Memory, Abstraction, Physics, Semantics) and reasoning types (descriptive, explanatory, predictive, counterfactual). Shows significant performance gap between human baseline (91.4%) and state-of-the-art video QA models (46.2%).
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.