llmboard.ai
Benchmarks
CompareRankings
llmboard.ai
Benchmarks
CompareRankings
HomeBenchmarksmultimodalPathMCQA

multimodal benchmark

PathMCQA

PathMMU is a massive multimodal expert-level benchmark for understanding and reasoning in pathology, containing 33,428 multimodal multi-choice questions and 24,067 images validated by seven pathologists. It evaluates Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) performance on pathology tasks, with the top-performing model GPT-4V achieving only 49.8% zero-shot performance compared to 71.8% for human pathologists.

Updated Aug 11, 2026

Models1
Model coverage1
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Highlights
  • About
  • FAQ

PathMCQA Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

1 rows
Columns

Show columns

1GOMedGemma 4B ITGoogle69.8%100.0%1CAug 11, 2026

PathMCQA Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1MedGemma 4B IT69.8%

What is PathMCQA?

What PathMCQA measures and how its scores work.

PathMMU is a massive multimodal expert-level benchmark for understanding and reasoning in pathology, containing 33,428 multimodal multi-choice questions and 24,067 images validated by seven pathologists. It evaluates Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) performance on pathology tasks, with the top-performing model GPT-4V achieving only 49.8% zero-shot performance compared to 71.8% for human pathologists.

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
PathMCQA
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
multimodal
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
pathmcqa|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about PathMCQA.

Which model scores highest on PathMCQA?

MedGemma 4B IT is currently ranked first with 69.8%.

What does PathMCQA measure?

PathMMU is a massive multimodal expert-level benchmark for understanding and reasoning in pathology, containing 33,428 multimodal multi-choice questions and 24,067 images validated by seven pathologists. It evaluates Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) performance on pathology tasks, with the top-performing model GPT-4V achieving only 49.8% zero-shot performance compared to 71.8% for human pathologists.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

1 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

No. This benchmark is shown for reference but does not contribute to the overall score.

Rankings

OverallCodingText ArenaPricing

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Benchmarks

All BenchmarksReasoningMathCoding

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai