llmboard.ai
Benchmarks
CompareRankings
llmboard.ai
Benchmarks
CompareRankings
HomeBenchmarksreasoningPaperBench

reasoning benchmark

PaperBench

PaperBench is a benchmark for evaluating AI agents on their ability to replicate research papers. It tests models on complex, multi-step workflows involving code implementation, experimentation, and reproducing scientific results from academic publications.

Updated Aug 7, 2026

Published models3
Registry coverage3
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Distribution
  • Highlights
  • About
  • FAQ

PaperBench leaderboard

Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.

3 rows
Columns

Show columns

1ACQwen3.8 MaxAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team93.0%100.0%3CAug 7, 2026
2MAKimi K2.5Moonshot AI63.5%50.0%3CAug 7, 2026
3MIMiniMax M3MiniMax52.6%0.0%3CAug 7, 2026

Score distribution

Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.

PaperBench

PaperBench highlights

The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.

Rank #1Qwen3.8 Max93.0%Rank #2Kimi K2.563.5%Rank #3MiniMax M352.6%

What is PaperBench?

Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.

PaperBench is a benchmark for evaluating AI agents on their ability to replicate research papers. It tests models on complex, multi-step workflows involving code implementation, experimentation, and reproducing scientific results from academic publications.

Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.

Family
PaperBench
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
No
Evaluation key
paperbench|llm-stats-current

Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.

FAQ

Common questions about PaperBench.

Which model scores highest on PaperBench?

Qwen3.8 Max is currently ranked first with 93.0%.

What does PaperBench measure?

PaperBench is a benchmark for evaluating AI agents on their ability to replicate research papers. It tests models on complex, multi-step workflows involving code implementation, experimentation, and reproducing scientific results from academic publications.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

3 unique published model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.

Rankings

OverallCodingText ArenaPricing

Modalities

Image GenerationVideo GenerationSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Benchmarks

All BenchmarksReasoningMathCoding

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai