multimodal benchmark
OSWorld 2.0
OSWorld 2.0 is a benchmark of 108 long-horizon, real-world computer-use workflows spanning everyday and professional tasks. Each task is an end-to-end workflow that takes human users a median of about 1.6 hours, scored with a binary-completion metric, and targets challenges such as dynamic environments, cross-source reasoning, and implicit-state inference.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Published models4
Registry coverage4
MetricScore
EvidenceB
OSWorld 2.0 leaderboard
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | AN | 70.6% | 100.0% | 4 | C | |
| 2 | OP | 62.6% | 66.7% | 4 | C | |
| 3 | OP | 50.2% | 33.3% | 4 | C | |
| 4 | OP | 45.6% | 0.0% | 4 | C |
Score distribution
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
OSWorld 2.0 highlights
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
What is OSWorld 2.0?
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
OSWorld 2.0 is a benchmark of 108 long-horizon, real-world computer-use workflows spanning everyday and professional tasks. Each task is an end-to-end workflow that takes human users a median of about 1.6 hours, scored with a binary-completion metric, and targets challenges such as dynamic environments, cross-source reasoning, and implicit-state inference.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
- Family
- OSWorld 2.0
- Modality
- multimodal
- Primary category
- multimodal
- Score direction
- higher
- LLMBoard eligible
- No
- Evaluation key
- osworld-2.0|llm-stats-current
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
FAQ
Common questions about OSWorld 2.0.
Which model scores highest on OSWorld 2.0?
Claude Opus 5 is currently ranked first with 70.6%.
What does OSWorld 2.0 measure?
OSWorld 2.0 is a benchmark of 108 long-horizon, real-world computer-use workflows spanning everyday and professional tasks. Each task is an end-to-end workflow that takes human users a median of about 1.6 hours, scored with a binary-completion metric, and targets challenges such as dynamic environments, cross-source reasoning, and implicit-state inference.
Is a higher score better?
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
How many models are compared?
4 unique published model results are currently shown.
Does this benchmark affect the overall score?
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.