reasoning benchmark
MuSR (Multistep Soft Reasoning) is a benchmark for evaluating language models on multistep soft reasoning tasks specified in natural language narratives. Created through a neurosymbolic synthetic-to-natural generation algorithm, it generates complex reasoning scenarios like murder mysteries roughly 1000 words in length that challenge current LLMs including GPT-4. The benchmark tests chain-of-thought reasoning capabilities across domains involving commonsense reasoning about physical and social situations.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | MA | 76.4% | 100.0% | 2 | C | |
| 2 | NR | 50.7% | 0.0% | 2 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
MuSR (Multistep Soft Reasoning) is a benchmark for evaluating language models on multistep soft reasoning tasks specified in natural language narratives. Created through a neurosymbolic synthetic-to-natural generation algorithm, it generates complex reasoning scenarios like murder mysteries roughly 1000 words in length that challenge current LLMs including GPT-4. The benchmark tests chain-of-thought reasoning capabilities across domains involving commonsense reasoning about physical and social situations.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about MuSR.
Kimi K2 Instruct is currently ranked first with 76.4%.
MuSR (Multistep Soft Reasoning) is a benchmark for evaluating language models on multistep soft reasoning tasks specified in natural language narratives. Created through a neurosymbolic synthetic-to-natural generation algorithm, it generates complex reasoning scenarios like murder mysteries roughly 1000 words in length that challenge current LLMs including GPT-4. The benchmark tests chain-of-thought reasoning capabilities across domains involving commonsense reasoning about physical and social situations.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.