reasoning benchmark
MRCR (Multi-Round Coreference Resolution) is a synthetic long-context reasoning task where models must navigate long conversations to reproduce specific model outputs. It tests the ability to distinguish between similar requests and reason about ordering while maintaining attention across extended contexts.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | GO | 93.0% | 100.0% | 7 | C | |
| 2 | GO | 82.6% | 83.3% | 7 | C | |
| 3 | GO | 71.9% | 66.7% | 7 | C | |
| 4 | GO | 69.2% | 50.0% | 7 | C | |
| 5 | GO | 54.7% | 33.3% | 7 | C | |
| 6 | XI | 45.7% | 16.7% | 7 | C | |
| 7 | GO | 32.0% | 0.0% | 7 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
MRCR (Multi-Round Coreference Resolution) is a synthetic long-context reasoning task where models must navigate long conversations to reproduce specific model outputs. It tests the ability to distinguish between similar requests and reason about ordering while maintaining attention across extended contexts.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about MRCR.
Gemini 2.5 Pro is currently ranked first with 93.0%.
MRCR (Multi-Round Coreference Resolution) is a synthetic long-context reasoning task where models must navigate long conversations to reproduce specific model outputs. It tests the ability to distinguish between similar requests and reason about ordering while maintaining attention across extended contexts.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
7 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.