reasoning benchmark
MRCR v2 (Multi-Round Coreference Resolution version 2) is an enhanced version of the synthetic long-context reasoning task. It extends the original MRCR framework with improved evaluation criteria and additional complexity for testing models' ability to maintain attention and reasoning across extended contexts.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | AC | 91.7% | 100.0% | 3 | C | |
| 2 | GO | 32.0% | 50.0% | 3 | C | |
| 3 | GO | 16.6% | 0.0% | 3 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
MRCR v2 (Multi-Round Coreference Resolution version 2) is an enhanced version of the synthetic long-context reasoning task. It extends the original MRCR framework with improved evaluation criteria and additional complexity for testing models' ability to maintain attention and reasoning across extended contexts.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about MRCR v2.
Qwen3.7-Plus is currently ranked first with 91.7%.
MRCR v2 (Multi-Round Coreference Resolution version 2) is an enhanced version of the synthetic long-context reasoning task. It extends the original MRCR framework with improved evaluation criteria and additional complexity for testing models' ability to maintain attention and reasoning across extended contexts.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
3 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.