multimodal benchmark
Validation set of the Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning benchmark. Features college-level multimodal questions across 6 core disciplines (Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, Tech & Engineering) spanning 30 subjects and 183 subfields with diverse image types including charts, diagrams, maps, and tables.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | AC | 78.1% | 100.0% | 11 | C | |
| 2 | AC | 76.0% | 90.0% | 11 | C | |
| 3 | AC | 76.0% | 80.0% | 11 | C | |
| 4 | AC | 74.2% | 70.0% | 11 | C | |
| 5 | AC | 74.1% | 60.0% | 11 | C | |
| 6 | AC | 70.8% | 50.0% | 11 | C | |
| 7 | AC | 69.6% | 40.0% | 11 | C | |
| 8 | AC | 67.4% | 30.0% | 11 | C | |
| 9 | GO | 64.9% | 20.0% | 11 | C | |
| 10 | GO | 59.6% | 10.0% | 11 | C | |
| 11 | GO | 48.8% | 0.0% | 11 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
Validation set of the Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning benchmark. Features college-level multimodal questions across 6 core disciplines (Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, Tech & Engineering) spanning 30 subjects and 183 subfields with diverse image types including charts, diagrams, maps, and tables.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about MMMU (val).
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is currently ranked first with 78.1%.
Validation set of the Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning benchmark. Features college-level multimodal questions across 6 core disciplines (Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, Tech & Engineering) spanning 30 subjects and 183 subfields with diverse image types including charts, diagrams, maps, and tables.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
11 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.