llmboard.ai
Benchmarks
CompareRankings
llmboard.ai
Benchmarks
CompareRankings
HomeBenchmarksmultimodalMME

multimodal benchmark

MME

A comprehensive evaluation benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models measuring both perception and cognition abilities across 14 subtasks. Features manually designed instruction-answer pairs to avoid data leakage and provides systematic quantitative assessment of MLLM capabilities.

Updated Aug 7, 2026

Published models3
Registry coverage3
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Distribution
  • Highlights
  • About
  • FAQ

MME leaderboard

Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.

3 rows
Columns

Show columns

1DEDeepSeek VL2DeepSeek22.5%100.0%3CAug 7, 2026
2DEDeepSeek VL2 SmallDeepSeek21.2%50.0%3CAug 7, 2026
3DEDeepSeek VL2 TinyDeepSeek19.1%0.0%3CAug 7, 2026

Score distribution

Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.

MME

MME highlights

The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.

Rank #1DeepSeek VL222.5%Rank #2DeepSeek VL2 Small21.2%Rank #3DeepSeek VL2 Tiny19.1%

What is MME?

Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.

A comprehensive evaluation benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models measuring both perception and cognition abilities across 14 subtasks. Features manually designed instruction-answer pairs to avoid data leakage and provides systematic quantitative assessment of MLLM capabilities.

Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.

Family
MME
Modality
multimodal
Primary category
multimodal
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
mme|llm-stats-current

Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.

FAQ

Common questions about MME.

Which model scores highest on MME?

DeepSeek VL2 is currently ranked first with 22.5%.

What does MME measure?

A comprehensive evaluation benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models measuring both perception and cognition abilities across 14 subtasks. Features manually designed instruction-answer pairs to avoid data leakage and provides systematic quantitative assessment of MLLM capabilities.

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

3 unique published model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

This benchmark is marked as eligible for the current LLMBoard capability methodology.

Rankings

OverallCodingText ArenaPricing

Modalities

Image GenerationVideo GenerationSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Benchmarks

All BenchmarksReasoningMathCoding

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai