multimodal benchmark
A multimodal web navigation benchmark comprising 2,000 open-ended tasks spanning 137 websites across 31 domains. Each task includes HTML documents paired with webpage screenshots, action sequences, and complex web interactions.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | AM | 63.7% | 100.0% | 3 | C | |
| 2 | AM | 60.7% | 50.0% | 3 | C | |
| 3 | AC | 55.8% | 0.0% | 3 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
A multimodal web navigation benchmark comprising 2,000 open-ended tasks spanning 137 websites across 31 domains. Each task includes HTML documents paired with webpage screenshots, action sequences, and complex web interactions.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about MM-Mind2Web.
Nova Pro is currently ranked first with 63.7%.
A multimodal web navigation benchmark comprising 2,000 open-ended tasks spanning 137 websites across 31 domains. Each task includes HTML documents paired with webpage screenshots, action sequences, and complex web interactions.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
3 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.