multimodal benchmark
A comprehensive benchmark for multi-task long video understanding that evaluates multimodal large language models on videos ranging from 3 minutes to 2 hours across 9 distinct tasks including reasoning, captioning, recognition, and summarization.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | AC | 87.4% | 100.0% | 10 | C | |
| 2 | AC | 87.3% | 88.9% | 10 | C | |
| 3 | AC | 86.7% | 77.8% | 10 | C | |
| 4 | AC | 86.6% | 66.7% | 10 | C | |
| 5 | AC | 86.2% | 55.6% | 10 | C | |
| 6 | AC | 85.9% | 44.4% | 10 | C | |
| 7 | AC | 85.6% | 33.3% | 10 | C | |
| 8 | AC | 84.3% | 22.2% | 10 | C | |
| 9 | AC | 83.8% | 11.1% | 10 | C | |
| 10 | AC | 70.2% | 0.0% | 10 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
A comprehensive benchmark for multi-task long video understanding that evaluates multimodal large language models on videos ranging from 3 minutes to 2 hours across 9 distinct tasks including reasoning, captioning, recognition, and summarization.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about MLVU.
Qwen3.7-Plus is currently ranked first with 87.4%.
A comprehensive benchmark for multi-task long video understanding that evaluates multimodal large language models on videos ranging from 3 minutes to 2 hours across 9 distinct tasks including reasoning, captioning, recognition, and summarization.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
10 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.