reasoning benchmark
MBPP (Mostly Basic Python Problems) is a benchmark of 974 crowd-sourced Python programming problems designed to be solvable by entry-level programmers. EvalPlus extends MBPP with significantly more test cases (35x) for more rigorous evaluation of LLM-synthesized code, providing high-quality and precise evaluation.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | ME | 72.8% | 100.0% | 1 | C |
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
MBPP (Mostly Basic Python Problems) is a benchmark of 974 crowd-sourced Python programming problems designed to be solvable by entry-level programmers. EvalPlus extends MBPP with significantly more test cases (35x) for more rigorous evaluation of LLM-synthesized code, providing high-quality and precise evaluation.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about MBPP EvalPlus (base).
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is currently ranked first with 72.8%.
MBPP (Mostly Basic Python Problems) is a benchmark of 974 crowd-sourced Python programming problems designed to be solvable by entry-level programmers. EvalPlus extends MBPP with significantly more test cases (35x) for more rigorous evaluation of LLM-synthesized code, providing high-quality and precise evaluation.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
1 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.