reasoning benchmark
LongCodeBench evaluates the code understanding and comprehension abilities of large language models at very long context windows, scaling up to 1M tokens. It tests whether models can reason about extensive codebases provided in a single prompt by answering multiple-choice questions about the code.
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | AM | 84.0% | 100.0% | 2 | C | |
| 2 | AM | 84.0% | 0.0% | 2 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
LongCodeBench evaluates the code understanding and comprehension abilities of large language models at very long context windows, scaling up to 1M tokens. It tests whether models can reason about extensive codebases provided in a single prompt by answering multiple-choice questions about the code.
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about LongCodeBench.
Nova 2 Lite is currently ranked first with 84.0%.
LongCodeBench evaluates the code understanding and comprehension abilities of large language models at very long context windows, scaling up to 1M tokens. It tests whether models can reason about extensive codebases provided in a single prompt by answering multiple-choice questions about the code.
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
2 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.