reasoning benchmark
LBPP (v2)
LBPP (v2) benchmark - specific documentation not found in official sources, possibly related to language-based planning problems
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Published models1
Registry coverage1
MetricScore
EvidenceB
LBPP (v2) leaderboard
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | GO | 56.8% | 100.0% | 1 | C |
LBPP (v2) highlights
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
What is LBPP (v2)?
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
LBPP (v2) benchmark - specific documentation not found in official sources, possibly related to language-based planning problems
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
- Family
- LBPP (v2)
- Modality
- text
- Primary category
- reasoning
- Score direction
- higher
- LLMBoard eligible
- No
- Evaluation key
- lbpp-(v2)|llm-stats-current
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
FAQ
Common questions about LBPP (v2).
Which model scores highest on LBPP (v2)?
Gemini Diffusion is currently ranked first with 56.8%.
What does LBPP (v2) measure?
LBPP (v2) benchmark - specific documentation not found in official sources, possibly related to language-based planning problems
Is a higher score better?
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
How many models are compared?
1 unique published model results are currently shown.
Does this benchmark affect the overall score?
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.