multimodal benchmark
InfoVQA dataset with 30,000 questions and 5,000 infographic images requiring joint reasoning over document layout, textual content, graphical elements, and data visualizations with elementary reasoning and arithmetic skills
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | AC | 83.4% | 100.0% | 9 | C | |
| 2 | AC | 82.6% | 87.5% | 9 | C | |
| 3 | DE | 78.1% | 75.0% | 9 | C | |
| 4 | DE | 75.8% | 62.5% | 9 | C | |
| 5 | MI | 72.7% | 50.0% | 9 | C | |
| 6 | GO | 70.6% | 37.5% | 9 | C | |
| 7 | DE | 66.1% | 25.0% | 9 | C | |
| 8 | GO | 64.9% | 12.5% | 9 | C | |
| 9 | GO | 50.0% | 0.0% | 9 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
InfoVQA dataset with 30,000 questions and 5,000 infographic images requiring joint reasoning over document layout, textual content, graphical elements, and data visualizations with elementary reasoning and arithmetic skills
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about InfoVQA.
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is currently ranked first with 83.4%.
InfoVQA dataset with 30,000 questions and 5,000 infographic images requiring joint reasoning over document layout, textual content, graphical elements, and data visualizations with elementary reasoning and arithmetic skills
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
9 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is preserved as source-native evidence but is not eligible for the current overall score.