llmboard.ai
Benchmarks
CompareRankings
llmboard.ai
Benchmarks
CompareRankings
HomeBenchmarksreasoningHumanEval+

reasoning benchmark

HumanEval+

Enhanced version of HumanEval that extends the original test cases by 80x using EvalPlus framework for rigorous evaluation of LLM-synthesized code functional correctness, detecting previously undetected wrong code

Updated Aug 11, 2026

Models10
Model coverage10
MetricScore
EvidenceB

On this page

  • Ranking
  • Distribution
  • Highlights
  • About
  • FAQ

HumanEval+ Ranking

Higher score ranks better on this benchmark.

10 rows
Columns

Show columns

1MIPhi 4 ReasoningMicrosoft92.9%100.0%10CAug 11, 2026
2MIPhi 4 Reasoning PlusMicrosoft92.3%88.9%10CAug 11, 2026
3IBGranite 3.3 8B BaseIBM86.1%77.8%10CAug 11, 2026
4IBGranite 3.3 8B InstructIBM86.1%66.7%10CAug 11, 2026
5MIPhi 4Microsoft82.8%55.6%10CAug 11, 2026
6IBIBM Granite 4.0 Tiny PreviewIBM78.3%44.4%10CAug 11, 2026
7XIMiMo-V2.5-ProXiaomi75.6%33.3%10CAug 11, 2026
8ACQwen2.5 32B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team52.4%22.2%10CAug 11, 2026
9ACQwen2.5 14B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team51.2%11.1%10CAug 11, 2026
10BAERNIE 4.5Baidu25.0%0.0%10CAug 11, 2026

HumanEval+ Score Distribution

A closer view of the leading scores on this benchmark.

HumanEval+

HumanEval+ Highlights

The leading models and scores on this benchmark.

Rank #1Phi 4 Reasoning92.9%Rank #2Phi 4 Reasoning Plus92.3%Rank #3Granite 3.3 8B Base86.1%Rank #4Granite 3.3 8B Instruct86.1%

What is HumanEval+?

What HumanEval+ measures and how its scores work.

Enhanced version of HumanEval that extends the original test cases by 80x using EvalPlus framework for rigorous evaluation of LLM-synthesized code functional correctness, detecting previously undetected wrong code

Scores are shown in ratio. This benchmark is not independently verified and has an evidence level of B.

Family
HumanEval+
Modality
text
Primary category
reasoning
Score direction
higher
LLMBoard eligible
Yes
Evaluation key
humaneval+|llm-stats-current

Benchmark scores retain their original unit. Overall score eligibility is shown separately.

FAQ

Common questions about HumanEval+.

Which model scores highest on HumanEval+?

Phi 4 Reasoning is currently ranked first with 92.9%.

What does HumanEval+ measure?

Enhanced version of HumanEval that extends the original test cases by 80x using EvalPlus framework for rigorous evaluation of LLM-synthesized code functional correctness, detecting previously undetected wrong code

Is a higher score better?

Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.

How many models are compared?

10 model results are currently shown.

Does this benchmark affect the overall score?

Yes. This benchmark can contribute to the current LLMBoard capability score.

Rankings

OverallCodingText ArenaPricing

Modalities

All ModelsImage GenerationImage EditingVideo GenerationImage-to-VideoVideo EditingText-to-SpeechSpeech-to-TextEmbeddings

Benchmarks

All BenchmarksReasoningMathCoding

Vendors

All VendorsOpenAIAnthropicGoogle
llmboard.aiCopyright 2026 llmboard.ai