math benchmark
Google DeepMind's internal mathematical reasoning benchmark that introduces novel problems not encountered during model training to evaluate true mathematical reasoning capabilities rather than memorization
Updated Aug 7, 2026
Sorted by the source-provided rank. Higher score is better according to the registry.
| 1 | GO | 63.0% | 100.0% | 13 | C | |
| 2 | GO | 60.3% | 91.7% | 13 | C | |
| 3 | GO | 55.3% | 83.3% | 13 | C | |
| 4 | GO | 54.5% | 75.0% | 13 | C | |
| 5 | GO | 52.0% | 66.7% | 13 | C | |
| 6 | GO | 47.2% | 58.3% | 13 | C | |
| 7 | GO | 43.0% | 50.0% | 13 | C | |
| 8 | GO | 37.7% | 41.7% | 13 | C | |
| 9 | GO | 37.7% | 33.3% | 13 | C | |
| 10 | GO | 32.8% | 25.0% | 13 | C | |
| 11 | GO | 27.7% | 16.7% | 13 | C | |
| 12 | GO | 27.7% | 8.3% | 13 | C | |
| 13 | GO | 15.8% | 0.0% | 13 | C |
Top published rows on the benchmark's original scale.
The top published results on this benchmark's own scale.
Definition and scoring fields from the benchmark registry.
Google DeepMind's internal mathematical reasoning benchmark that introduces novel problems not encountered during model training to evaluate true mathematical reasoning capabilities rather than memorization
Scores are shown in ratio. The current registry marks this benchmark as not independently verified with evidence level B.
Source-native results are preserved. Eligibility for the overall LLMBoard score is a separate policy decision.
Common questions about HiddenMath.
Gemini 2.0 Flash is currently ranked first with 63.0%.
Google DeepMind's internal mathematical reasoning benchmark that introduces novel problems not encountered during model training to evaluate true mathematical reasoning capabilities rather than memorization
Yes. Higher values rank better for this benchmark.
13 unique published model results are currently shown.
This benchmark is marked as eligible for the current LLMBoard capability methodology.